In a post last December, I reported about a case in Manitoba being fought over the jurisdiction of a proposed pipeline - federal or provincial. A group of affected landowners had sought leave to appeal a decision of the Surface Rights Board and had also requested the judicial review of Manitoba's decision to approve the pipeline. The leave to appeal matter was put on hold pending the outcome of the judicial review. In January of this year, the Court of Queen's Bench issued its decision on the judicial review.
The landowners applied to the Court for an order declaring that the pipeline is interprovincial and, therefore, outside the jurisdiction of the Province of Manitoba. They had previously applied to the National Energy Board (NEB) for the same order, but that application was rejected.
On the basis of the test set out in the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Westcoast Energy Inc. v. Canada (National Energy Board), the Court ruled that the Manitoba pipeline was provincial in nature and, therefore, within the jurisdiction of the Province. The Court found that the EOG pipeline (the one at issue in the case) and the MIPL pipeline (the cross-border pipeline to which the EOG pipeline would connect) were not a single federal undertaking, and that the EOG pipeline is not integral to the operation of the MIPL pipeline. On that basis, the EOG pipeline did not become part of the interprovincial MIPL pipeline for the purpose of determining its jurisdiction. As the EOG pipeline is located within the boundaries of Manitoba, it is a provincial pipeline.
Read the decision at: Daniels et al v. EOG Resources et al.